How US intermodal operators are killing their own industry
The United States’ much-vaunted intermodal network is in an utter mess, according to a pile ...
LINE: REACTIONLINE: EXPENSES AND OPERATING LEVERAGELINE: PIPELINE OF DEALS LINE: DEMAND PATTERNS LINE: LANDSCAPELINE: CONF CALL STARTSDSV: UNTOUCHABLEEXPD: NOT AS BULLISH AS PREVIOUSLYFWRD: SPECULATIVE RALLY MAERSK: INTEGRATED LOGISTICS WIN MAERSK: TRUMP TRADEKNIN: THE SLIDELINE: DEBUT AAPL: ASIA CAPEXDHL: THE HANGOVERXPO: ELECTION DAY RALLY BA: STRIKE OVER GXO: SHEIN AND TEMU IMPACT
LINE: REACTIONLINE: EXPENSES AND OPERATING LEVERAGELINE: PIPELINE OF DEALS LINE: DEMAND PATTERNS LINE: LANDSCAPELINE: CONF CALL STARTSDSV: UNTOUCHABLEEXPD: NOT AS BULLISH AS PREVIOUSLYFWRD: SPECULATIVE RALLY MAERSK: INTEGRATED LOGISTICS WIN MAERSK: TRUMP TRADEKNIN: THE SLIDELINE: DEBUT AAPL: ASIA CAPEXDHL: THE HANGOVERXPO: ELECTION DAY RALLY BA: STRIKE OVER GXO: SHEIN AND TEMU IMPACT
And so the u-turns begin. One of the Conservative Party pledges was to upgrade the UK’s rail infrastructure, much of it built in the Victorian era, over the course of this five-year government. Everyone agrees it is urgently needed, but it now appears that the Department for Transport was made aware before the May election that there were neither the funds for the myriad projects proposed, and that the projects themselves were growing in cost.
Comment on this article